Saint Francis of Assisi revealing and demasking the Jesuit Jorge aka Francis I

~ Keeping a critical eye on Vatican 2 ~

~ Keeping a critical eye on Vatican 2 ~
It is granted to few to recognize the true Church amid the darkness of so many schisms and heresies,
and to fewer still so to love the truth which they have seen as to fly to its embrace. -St. Robert Bellarmine

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Anathema sit

The two-horned Pope


Pope Francis Horned by Times 01GGod

After Freemasonry, Judaism and Communism praised Pope Francis and sent him their best wishes to continue to do what he is doing with the Catholic Church, this week, in its December 23, 2013 issue, Time magazine chose him as its Person of the Year, an award that places him on the Time's front cover, above.

The reason given for this promotion of Francis was that, according to Time, Francis is "about the healing mission of the Catholic Church, and not about her theological police work."

What is curious is that the magazine chose to place the head of the Pope directly in front of the M of the magazine's title, giving the impression he has two horns. Was this a mere coincidence? Was it a joke? Was it an anti-Catholic mockery of this Masonic-inspired magazine? We are not in conditions to give certain answers to these questions.

What is clear is that, with this kind of propaganda, the public becomes accustomed to laughingly see a devilish-like Bergoglio as Pope. Is there any other implicit message? When the Antichrist will appear, will he not start to laughingly reveal his reliance on the Devil in order to make the latter be accepted by everyone?


Saturday, December 21, 2013

Bergoglio , stop blaspheming , stop being an apostate !!!

Bergoglio :   She was silent, but in her heart, how many things told the Lord! ‘You, that day, this and the other that we read, you had told me that he would be great, you had told me that you would have given him the throne of David, his forefather, that he would have reigned forever and now I see him there!’ Our Lady was human! And perhaps she even had the desire to say: ‘Lies! I was deceived!’ 

Bergogio , stop being an apostate , stop being a pretender , stop destroying the Holy and Only Church of Christ : the Holy Catholic Church as it was before the Vatican 2 .

The Holy Mother of God was never regretting or complaining , never considering herself deceived , the Holy and forever Immaculate Mother of God was fully partaking to the sorrowful Passion of her Holy Son , our Lord Jesus Christ .

Pope Pius IX in his Apostolic Constitution Ineffabilis Deus said :

That his most Blessed Mother, the Virgin Mary, was prophetically indicated; and, at the same time, the very enmity of both against the evil one was significantly expressed. Hence, just as Christ, the Mediator between God and man, assumed human nature, blotted the handwriting of the decree that stood against us, and fastened it triumphantly to the cross, so the most holy Virgin, united with him by a most intimate and indissoluble bond, was, with him and through him, eternally at enmity with the evil serpent, and most completely triumphed over him, and thus crushed his head with her immaculate foot.

Pope Pius IX was a true Vicar of Christ , not the deceiver and blasphemer Bergogio !

Anathema sit , you Jesuit !

Friday, October 18, 2013

God bless Father Rodriguez for being a true Priest of the Holy Catholic Church and a true soldier of Christ

A secular guy / gay admiration for the "Francis - who is he to judge the homosexuals " ! Exactly , who is he ???

Communists Cheer Francis !!! as well all pagan sects , all atheists and all enemies of the Holy Catholic Church - the only Church of Christ

Great admiration and applause from the Communists toward the modernist and anti-Catholic Bishop of Rome ! Of course , why not ... he is one of them .
Francis the demagogue and deceiver has forgotten what the Holy Catholic has taught against the red plague of Communism . Holy Mother of God herself asked the Consecration of Russia to her Immaculate Heart as a remedy against the dangerous spreading of errors of Communism .
We have also the treasure of our previous (true ) Popes encyclicals , each and single one opposing vigorously the heresy of Communism .

Pope Pius XI, "Divini Redemptoris", 1937 :

"In the beginning Communism showed itself for what it was in all its perversity; but very soon it realized that it was thus alienating the people. It has therefore changed its tactics, and strives to entice the multitudes by trickery of various forms, hiding its real designs behind ideas that in themselves are good and attractive. Thus, aware of the universal desire for peace, the leaders of Communism pretend to be the most zealous promoters and propagandists in the movement for world amity. Yet at the same time they stir up a class-warfare which causes rivers of blood to flow, and, realizing that their system offers no internal guarantee of peace, they have recourse to unlimited armaments. Under various names which do not suggest Communism, they establish organizations and periodicals with the sole purpose of carrying their ideas into quarters otherwise inaccessible. They try perfidiously to worm their way even into professedly Catholic and religious organizations. Again, without receding an inch from their subversive principles, they invite Catholics to collaborate with them in the realm of so-called humanitarianism and charity; and at times even make proposals that are in perfect harmony with the Christian spirit and the doctrine of the Church. Elsewhere they carry their hypocrisy so far as to encourage the belief that Communism, in countries where faith and culture are more strongly entrenched, will assume another and much milder form. It will not interfere with the practice of religion. It will respect liberty of conscience. There are some even who refer to certain changes recently introduced into soviet legislation as a proof that Communism is about to abandon its program of war against God. 
See to it, Venerable Brethren, that the Faithful do not allow themselves to be deceived! 
Communism is intrinsically wrong, and no one who would save Christian civilization may collaborate with it in any undertaking whatsoever. Those who permit themselves to be deceived into lending their aid towards the triumph of Communism in their own country, will be the first to fall victims of their error. And the greater the antiquity and grandeur of the Christian civilization in the regions where Communism successfully penetrates, so much more devastating will be the hatred displayed by the godless." 

Source :The American Spectator : Communists Cheer Pope Francis

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Liberal and Conservative: Christ vs. Church? - Catholic Culture !!!!! Christ is NOT Liberal - although the Church is Catholic

This is Not a deep analyse Mr. J Mirus !!! It's just a low liberal apology , it's mischievous tentative to brainwash the readers of Catholic Culture - one of the Vatican 2's affiliate internet sites .

In the depth "analyse" Mr. Mirus is emphazing :
"The liberal or progressive Catholic emphasizes the affective( !!!) side of religion, the need for empathy (!!! ), the importance of caring about people as they are, not as we would like them to be. And because the liberal or progressive Catholic is (typically but not always) largely formed morally by the secular culture in which he lives, he also finds it advantageous to reduce the content of religious faith. What is important is the heart, not the head."

No comments . Only one sentence : anathema sit haereticus !

Source : Liberal and Conservative: Christ vs. Church? - Catholic Culture

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Francis Rallies The Forces Of antiChrist

Although we are yet one day away from Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis's "consecration" of the world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, which may be accompanied by yet another effort to link Our Lady's Fatima Message to false ecumenism and the role of the "world's religions" in the "establishment of peace," there has been so much happening in the past few days that it is becoming ever more certain that the Antichrist cannot be far away.

After all, one of the signs of the coming of Antichrist is the gathering of all of the world's false religions together the One World Ecumenical Church about which Pope Saint Pius X had warned us very precisely one hundred three years ago now:

 And now, overwhelmed with the deepest sadness, We ask Ourselves, Venerable Brethren, what has become of the Catholicism of the Sillon? Alas! this organization which formerly afforded such promising expectations, this limpid and impetuous stream, has been harnessed in its course by the modern enemies of the Church, and is now no more than a miserable affluent of the great movement of apostasy being organized in every country for the establishment of a One-World Church which shall have neither dogmas, nor hierarchy, neither discipline for the mind, nor curb for the passions, and which, under the pretext of freedom and human dignity, would bring back to the world (if such a Church could overcome) the reign of legalized cunning and force, and the oppression of the weak, and of all those who toil and suffer. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)

God hates all false religions. He loathes them. He wants them eradicated from the face of this earth as their adherents are converted to the true Faith.

The Catholic Church, ever faithful to Him as she is guided by Him infallibly, must hate what he hates: sin and error and falsehood. This is not an option for a Catholic.

We must hate sin in our own lives. We must seek to root it out as we cooperate with the graces won for us by Our Lord on the wood of the Holy Cross that flow into our hearts and souls through the loving hands of Our Lady, the Mediatrix of All Graces.

We must hate the spread of sin in the world under cover of the civil law and in the midst of popular culture. We must make no conscious compromise with error or falsehood.

We must be earnest about planting seeds for the conversion of all non-Catholics to the true Faith, outside of which there is no salvation and without with there can be no true social order.

This is, of course, a chastisement for our sins, for our own infidelities, for our own lukewarmness, for our own lack of steadfastness in prayer, especially to the Mother of God, who is blasphemed by the notion that she smiles favorably upon the "renewal" wrought by the "Second" Vatican Council and the magisterium of he conciliar "popes," and no show of purported devotion to Our Lady's Fatima Message today by Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis can in any way please her as he smashes to smithereens the the remaining vestiges of Catholicism in the conciliar church to rally the forces of Antichrist together into the One World Ecumenical Church.

We need to pray many Rosaries of reparation now that these additional offenses have been given to God the false "pontiff." We need, therefore, to make much reparation for these sins as we seek always to make reparation for our own sins as we entrust to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary the need of the present moment, praying as many Rosaries each day as our state in life permits.

We must, of course, continue to remember that this is the time that God has appointed from all eternity for us to be alive. He has work for us to do. Let us do this work with courage and valor as we never count the cost of being humiliated for the sake of defending the integrity of Faith, as we never cease our prayers for the conversion of all people, including those who adhere to all false religions, including those who adhere to the Talmud, for the conversion of the conciliar revolutionaries, to the true Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true social order.

Viva Cristo Rey! Vivat Christus Rex!

Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon!

 Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?

Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint Edward the Confessor, pray for us. Amen

Source : Christ or Chaos 
Francis Rallies The Forces Of antiChrist

Pope and head of EU Parliament discuss creating 'more human corridors' for boat people and refugees - Vatican Insider

... alien islamist immigrants occupying the entire world , part of a masonic strategy -

Widening the scope of legal immigration and creating more human corridors for refugees coming to Europe as well as temporary permits for refugees are measures Europe could adopt to deal with the immigration emergency after the Lampedusa boat tragedy, Schultz underlined. The subject of immigration took up much of this morning’s half-hour meeting with the Pope, who asked for greater attention to be paid to the issues linked to this phenomenon.

Source :
Bergoglio gives Schultz a push: “Europe must live up to its responsibilities” - Vatican Insider

Dangerous Times: Obama Bows to the Mullahs !!! Well , 0bama is not the only one ...I know another one making bows in front of the islamists ( living and leading from the modernist masonic Vatican 2 ) ...

I know another one - which we can call him Jorge alias Francis - who likes shake hands and to bow in front of the islamists  . He's living and leading from the modernist masonic and anti-Catholic Vatican 2 ) ...

Anyway the mullahs will certainly get their nukes and ICBMs, and neither Israel nor the Saudis (who are scared to death of the mullahs) will rely on American protection as long as Obama is in office. Obama just put out the welcome mat for Mullah Rouhani, the killer of 245 U.S. Marines in Beirut in 1984, and the ultraleft UK Guardian just claimed that its readers voted for Great Humanitarian Rouhani to be the next winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. 

Articles: Dangerous Times: Obama Bows to the Mullahs

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Great article via Remnant Newspaper about Francis the "most humble"

Over the past several weeks we have watched, stunned, as Pope Francis conducts little short of a public jeremiad against Catholics he deems insufficiently in tune with Vatican II’s “dynamic of reading the Gospel, actualizing its message for today”—whatever that means—which he insists is “absolutely irreversible” even as the destruction from the failed conciliar aggiornamento continues to mount.

Francis has mocked Catholics who counted the Rosaries in their spiritual bouquets for him, belittling them before an audience of young people as poor peasants who “return to practices and to disciplines that I lived through—not you, because you are not old…” And he has maintained a drumbeat of derision of Catholic traditionalists: they are “Pelagians,” “restorationists,” and “legalists,” who in their hearts do not believe in the Risen Lord and thus indulge in “triumphalism” and a “triumphalist” liturgy; they seek an “exaggerated doctrinal ‘security’” (note the contemptuous quotation marks around the word security), want “everything clear and safe” in the Church (imagine!), “always look for disciplinarian solutions,” “stubbornly try to recover a past that no longer exists,” and “have a static and inward-directed view of things” that reduces their faith to “an ideology among other ideologies.”

The liberal utterances of this Pope are so disturbing, and the world’s thunderous applause so alarming, that we are suddenly facing a new stage in what Pope Benedict (writing as Cardinal Ratzinger) called “the continuing process of decay” that began immediately after the Council.

Mike Matt and others have rightly noted that Pope Francis is merely extending the trajectory on which the human element of the Church has been moving since Vatican II. As Neumayr puts it, Francis is “run[ning] the ball into the end zone…”—just when we thought, under Pope Benedict, that team Vatican II had been penalized and moved back a few crucial yards toward the goalpost of Tradition. But under Francis the ball is moving downfield again with amazing rapidity, even beyond where it was before Benedict was Pope. Now, not only we traditionalists, but also prominent conservative Catholics of good will are standing up and calling foul. With us, they can see what lies ahead in the end zone, and they do not like what they see; they are, in fact, frightened by it.

Perhaps, then, the emergence of Jorge Bergoglio from the last conclave was a providential development. For it is forcing more and more Catholics to make a choice: either the continued absorption of the Church into the “modern world” to which the conciliar Popes imprudently opened the Church’s windows, or a definitive return to the safety of the very “fortress” the “spirit of Vatican II” despises: that house built upon the rock of Peter; that refuge of sinners, sustained against the storms by the solid structure of obedience to the commands of the Gospel: “And every one that heareth these my words, and doth them not, shall be like a foolish man that built his house upon the sand/And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they beat upon that house, and it fell, and great was the fall thereof…. If you love me, keep my commandments.” (Matt. 7:24-27; Jn. 14:15).

Having issued these public judgments against faithful Catholics, the Pope who will be known forever by the phrase “Who am I to judge?” respecting homosexuals has also passed judgment on the Church herself, and by implication his predecessors, suggesting that he will correct her many shortcomings as Vatican II demands. Quoth Francis in the now infamous America magazine interview and elsewhere:

“The church sometimes has locked itself up in small things, little rules.”’

“Heads of the Church have often been narcissists, flattered and thrilled by their courtiers.’

“We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods…. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently.”

“We have to find a new balance; otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards.”

“The church is or should go back to being a community of God’s people, and priests, pastors and bishops who have the care of souls, are at the service of the people of God.”

“But the church has lived also times of decline in its ability to think. Unfortunately, I studied philosophy from textbooks that came from decadent or largely bankrupt Thomism. In thinking of the human being, therefore, the church should strive for genius and not for decadence.”

“When does a formulation [of doctrine] of thought cease to be valid? When it loses sight of the human or even when it is afraid of the human or deluded about itself…

The thinking of the church must recover genius and better understand how human beings understand themselves today, in order to develop and deepen the church’s teaching.”

“The Council Fathers knew that being open to modern culture meant religious ecumenism and dialogue with non-believers. But afterwards very little was done [!] in that direction….“I have the humility and ambition to want to do something.”

Source THE REMNANT NEWSPAPER: The Christian Life

Republished: The Work of Columbus

Columbus Day is a time for us to reflect on the fact that the Church herself sought to convert the souls of the indigenous peoples of the Americas from their pagan and barbaric practices so as to have access to the life giving treasures found in the sacraments, teaching us that we must have the same zeal for souls in our own day despite the fact that the counterfeit church of conciliarism has rejected "proselytizing" as an offense to the heresy of "religious liberty." We must do exactly what Columbus and the priests who accompanied him did: seek the good of souls by praying and acting for the conversion of all men and women everywhere to the true Church founded by Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and Saviour Jesus Christ Himself upon the rock of Peter, the Pope.

We must continue the work of Columbus with every beat of our hearts, entrusting all to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, praying as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit!

Viva Cristo Rey!

Our Lady of Guadalupe, Patroness of the Americas, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Juan Diego, pray for us.

Saint Turibius of Mongrovejo, pray for us.

Saint Rose of Lima, pray for us.

Blessed Martin de Porres, pray for us.

Blessed John de Massias, pray for us.

Saint Peter Claver, pray for us.

Mother Elizabeth Ann Seton, pray for us.

Saint Francis Xavier Cabrini, pray for us.

Venerable John Neumann, pray for us.

Saint Francis Solano, pray for us.

Saint Isaac Jogues, pray for us.

Saint Rene Goupil, pray for us.

Saint John Lalande, pray for us.

Saint Gregory Lalemont, pray for us.

Saint John de Brebeuf, pray for us.

Fray Junipero Serra, pray for us.

Father Miguel Augstin Pro, pray for us.

The Mexican Martyrs, pray for us.

Saint John Lalande, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel Lalemant, pray for us.

Saint Noel Chabanel, pray for us.

Saint Charles Garnier, pray for us.

Saint Anthony Daniel, pray for us.

Saint John De Brebeuf, pray for us.Amen

Republished: Today the Work of Columbus ( Christ or Chaos )

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Prophecy of Saint Francis ends with : " not a true Pastor, but a destroyer"

Shortly before he died, St. Francis of Assisi called together his followers and warned them of the coming troubles, saying:
 "1. The time is fast approaching in which there will be great trials and afflictions; perplexities and dissensions, both spiritual and temporal, will abound; the charity of many will grow cold, and the malice of the wicked will increase. "

2. The devils will have unusual power, the immaculate purity of our Order, and of others, will be so much obscured that there will be very few Christians who will obey the true Sovereign Pontiff and the Roman Church with loyal hearts and perfect charity. At the time of this tribulation a man, not canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate, who, by his cunning, will endeavour to draw many into error and death. "

3. Then scandals will be multiplied, our Order will be divided, and many others will be entirely destroyed, because they will consent to error instead of opposing it. "

4. There will be such diversity of opinions and schisms among the people, the religious and the clergy, that, except those days were shortened, according to the words of the Gospel, even the elect would be led into error, were they not specially guided, amid such great confusion, by the immense mercy of God. "

5. Then our Rule and manner of life will be violently opposed by some, and terrible trials will come upon us. Those who are found faithful will receive the crown of life; but woe to those who, trusting solely in their Order, shall fall into tepidity, for they will not be able to support the temptations permitted for the proving of the elect. "

6. Those who preserve their fervour and adhere to virtue with love and zeal for the truth, will suffer injuries and, persecutions as rebels and schismatics; for their persecutors, urged on by the evil spirits, will say they are rendering a great service to God by destroying such pestilent men from the face of the earth. but the Lord will be the refuge of the afflicted, and will save all who trust in Him. And in order to be like their Head, [Christ] these, the elect, will act with confidence, and by their death will purchase for themselves eternal life; choosing to obey God rather than man, they will fear nothing, and they will prefer to perish rather than consent to falsehood and perfidy. "

7. Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it under foot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor, but a destroyer."

 ( source: The Revelation: Sings and Symbols )

Who is he to stand against abortions ???

( picture courtesy The Revelations : Signs and Symbols )

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Two a kind ..

Obama welcomes 'Pope' Francis' remarks on gays, abortion!
Obama who has worked to expand gay rights as president and last year backed same-sex marriage. He also supports the use of contraception and a woman's right to an abortion. 

The confused Jesuit should be the first to fight against the crime of abortion , as well against the abomination of homosexuality !

 ( courtesy The Revelation: Signs and Symbols )

Pope Francis contemplates appointing a female cardinal | In English | EL PAÍS

It’s not a joke. It’s something that Pope Francis has thought about before: naming a woman cardinal. Those who know the pope, both before and after he took over from Ratzinger, say that the first Jesuit pontiff is not only surprising people with his comments, but also with his actions. And this has been happening throughout his first six months in the role.

Those who think that Francis – who has all the simplicity of a parish priest – is a naïve man are wrong. This pope isn’t an ordinary pope. He has come to St. Peter’s with concrete plans for the Catholic Church: he wants to revive Christianity by taking it back to its origins.

The symbolism of his actions began when he first appeared on the balcony at St. Peter’s, calling himself “a bishop” and asking the people to bless him. Since then, he has wasted no time in making unexpected decisions, which have shocked those both inside and outside the Church.

Pope Francis contemplates appointing a female cardinal | In English | EL PAÍS

Hey Jorge the Jesuit , I suggest you Nancy Pelosi , she's available !

The only Truth

‘Call Me Jorge’ ... humble demagogue or deceiver ??..

( writen by Marian T. Horvat, Ph.D.)
Among many egalitarian innovations of the new Pope, one that is particularly shocking is his constant disregard for the papal titles. Since the title represents the office, one can only suspect that he holds the traditional idea of the Pope as Supreme Pontiff as superfluous, remnants of a still lingering medieval monarchical mentality that he is trying to eradicate.
One does not win points with Jorge Bergoglio by calling him Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church (Summus Pontifex Ecclesiae Universalis) or just the Sovereign Pontiff (in Latin, Summus Pontifex). He refers to himself as the Bishop of Rome, just the first among equals of the Cardinals. As for addressing him with the traditional title “Your Holiness,” which seems the bare minimum of respect to show for the Head of the Catholic Church, even that is no longer necessary. When he is asked what he should be called, he responds quickly, “Just call me Jorge.” José María del Corral, director of the ‘School of Neighbors’ educational program in Buenos Aires was one of the Pope’s special guests at his Inaugural Mass. In passing, let me stress that this school, an initiative supported by Card. Bergoglio, is not to catechize the youth in the Catholic Faith. Rather, it brings together young people of different religions to teach them tolerance and “respect” for their differences. In effect, it promotes religious indifference. When Corral “bumped into” the Pope in the elevator, he asked, “How should I refer to you now?” The Pope answered, “Call me Jorge, what else?” This egalitarian gesture brought tears of joy to Corral’s eyes. I think it should bring tears of sorrow to the eyes of Catholics who love and revere the See of Peter and all that it represents.

No longer official titles

There is the report about how he was calling the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires to check in before celebrating Mass in St. Peter´s Square. This Jesuit, who should love the papacy above all things, instead loves to show the Pope is nothing but one of the people. This is why he makes his own phone calls. When a nun answered the phone, she asked “Who is calling?” and he said “Father Jorge.” The nun said “Your Holiness?” He responded, “Oh no, it's Father Jorge,” as if to say that this was not a time for official titles.
There is also the story circulating about how the Pope called the street newsstand in Buenos Aires where he purchased his daily paper for the last years. He wanted to cancel the subscription. Daniel del Regno answered the phone and heard a familiar voice, “Hello Daniel, Cardinal Jorge speaking.” The man thought it was one of his friends playing a joke on him, but the Pope insisted, “I’m serious. I’m Jorge Bergoglio. I am calling you from Rome.” And Daniel, realizing it was the Supreme Pontiff speaking, also broke down in tears. Later that day “Cardinal Jorge” telephoned his dentist to cancel his May teeth cleaning appointment. Then he made other calls, one to terminate his phone cell service, and another to give his plumber detailed instructions on fixing the showers in the bishop's residence next to the Basilica.

"One thing nice about this job (!!! )," noted Pope Francis about the Papacy, "is that I have lots of free time (!!!). Everything in the Church is running smoothly."
If actually he has lots of free time, it is not difficult to surmise that he is using all of it to destroy the dignity of the Papacy. In the two weeks since he became Pope, he had already destroyed as many symbols of the Papacy as the other five conciliar Popes together before him… By the way, if the Pope has so much free time, as Francis says, why did Benedict XVI renounce the office alleging he could not handle the overwhelming weight of governing the entire Catholic Church? One of the two Popes seems to not be telling us the truth..

.. the Jesuit is already excommunicated .

Holy Catholic Church Teaching on Apostasy in the Church: Excommunications Specially Reserved to the Pope:
These are twelve in number and are imposed upon the following persons:
 (1) "All apostates from the Christian Faith, heretics of every name and sect, and those who give them credence, who receive or countenance them, and generally all those who take up their defence."

Catholic Encyclopedia (1917)

.. for the deceiver in modernist Rome

Definition: "Apostasy from the Faith is the act by which a baptized person, after possessing the true Christian faith, totally rejects it.
The complete abandonment of the practice of the Faith is NOT apostasy, or even presumption of Apostasy.
A person is an apostate whether he joins a non-Christian religion, as Judaism, Buddhism, Islam, or falls into unbelief, atheism, materialism, agnosticism, rationalism, indifferentism, or "free-thought". Apostates from the Faith incur excommunication ipso facto, and other penalties"

(Definition from A Catholic Dictionary, 1951 )

The Hermeneutics Of Babbling

We should strive to pray a full fifteen decades of Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary on this great feast day of the Holy Rosary of the Most Blessed Virgin Mary, which is celebrated on the four hundred forty-second of the defeat of the Turkish Mohammedan fleet in the Bay of Lepanto by a heavily outnumbered Christian fleet under the command of Don John of Austria. 
Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary is the weapon that she gave Saint Dominic de Guzman, the founder of the Order of Preachers, to fight the heresy of Albigensianism in 1208. May we use this weapon well to fight the heresy of Modernism that envelops the minds of the conciliar revolutionaries, including Jorge Mario Bergoglio, and that keeps so many otherwise sane Catholics silent in this time when Antichrist is organizing his own forces for another and more universal Battle of Lepanto.
All to thee, Blessed Mother. All to thy Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart. Jesus, Mary and Joseph, we love you. Save souls!
Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?
Vivat Christus RexViva Cristo Rey!
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Pope Saint Mark, pray for us.
Saints Sergius, Bacchus and Apuleius, pray for us.

The Hermeneutics Of Babbling  by Thomas A. Droleskey

Monday, May 27, 2013

Dear pilgrims,

Although we are in the rain and we are cold, inside of us the charity of the Holy Ghost is burning! Our thoughts are with St Joseph on the road to Egypt, who, having understood that he was the adoptive and legal father of the Son of God, suddenly in the night had to leave Bethlehem and go into exile.

Well, this is rather in the image of our own situation, my dear faithful. We are on the paths of exile and that may be for a long time. We must take courage, with the Holy Ghost, imitating the example and the vocation of St. Joseph. When the angel said to him in the night: “Joseph take Mary and the Child and flee into Egypt!” immediately and without question, he went and stayed there, in a foreign country where he did not even know the language, for one or two years − until God called him back from Egypt. “I called my Son out of Egypt!”

(Looking at) our position in the Church, dear faithful, we resemble a little the Holy Family; we are in exile and yet we are the Holy Family. You see, the Holy Family of Jesus, Mary and Joseph was the seedling-Church! The Church did not yet exist but here was the Church in seed; there was first Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the head of the Church, his Mystical Body; then there was the first member of the Church, Mary, Most Holy, Immaculate Virgin, redeemed in advance through the blood of Jesus Christ; and there was Joseph, cleansed of original sin, probably before his birth (we do not know exactly).

So, the Holy Family represented the Church. Well we, dear faithful, in Tradition, the Society of St. Pius X and the friendly religious and priestly communities, we carry the Church into exile! Since the Church is officially occupied by the Modernists, we are sent into exile, carrying the Church within us, and this may last for a few more years, until the Lord sends his angel and tells us, “Now you can return to the land of Israel,” officially. But we are still carrying within us the Church!

I remember that Archbishop Lefebvre explained very well to us that we had within us, in Tradition, the four notes of the Catholic Church, the four marks of the Church, showing that, despite our abnormal situation of exile, we remain at the heart of the Catholic Church! We have indeed kept the unity of the Church, the catholicity of the Church, One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic.

“Unity” because we have kept the faith! The unity of the Church is first of all in the Catholic faith, in that all Catholics profess the same faith! Well, we have the unity of the Church because we have the faith of all time, dear faithful, and there is no question of leaving it and compromising with the modernist heresy.

After “One”, Holy! We have kept the holiness of the Church and of that you are the proof, dear families where God chooses these beautiful religious and priestly vocations, lives devoted to God which are a model for the whole Church! We have kept the note of the holiness of the Church by the grace of God.

“One, Holy,” Catholic! We also have the catholicity of the Church, for the Tradition we represent has spread worldwide! Not only in France, not only in the United States, represented here by its district superior, not only in Germany, represented by many pilgrims, not only in these places ... but all over the world! You, dear pilgrims, you are the proof that Tradition, so alive in us, is Catholic!
And finally we represent Apostolicity of the Church! The Church is Apostolic, we are also apostolic. That means we have the apostolic succession through our bishops. We, bishops of the Society of Saint Pius X, have received the episcopate from the hands of Archbishop Lefebvre in a legitimate way, even if it was abnormal. And therefore, as long as we remain in the Church, we carry the Church in exile.

So, dear faithful, we may often ask what is our vocation? Could it not be to seek from Rome those blessings which rightfully should be ours − to seek approval and recognition? Of course, this is a question we could ask ourselves, but it is not the essential question!

The real question we must ask ourselves is: “How should we witness to the Catholic faith today, in the present situation of the Church which is suffering a terrible crisis?”  What witness should we bear, today? And the answer is the testimony of all the witnesses of the Faith and the Martyrs! All these saints of the Church, these confessors of the Faith, all the martyrs of the Church are an example for us!

So here is the answer to that question, dear faithful!  This is the best way to bear witness before the whole Church: to be on a pinnacle and publicly condemned to exile. Well, this is to our advantage because our testimony is all the more striking for being considered a stumbling block by the Modernists  – just as Our Lord was by Herod at the time. Is it not an advantage for the Church to see where Tradition is? This is the stumbling block for the Modernists, for what is called the Conciliar Church, that is to say, the SECT that occupies the Catholic Church. This is an advantage for us, to be regarded as excluded and in exile, dear faithful; to be looked upon as the “stone rejected by the builders” which will become, and already is, the cornerstone, the stone that supports the building.

Is it not Tradition, the Catholic faith of all time that we represent? So here's why we do not weep if we do not receive from Rome that news which was perhaps expected… or whatever. Let us remain quietly in exile as the good Lord wills. And let us bear this witness to the Catholic faith that the martyrs have given.

I spoke this morning to the children about Saint Hermenegild. He was a young martyr, seventeen years old, who lived in the sixth century. He was Catholic, but his father was a heretic, an Arian. He was supposed to inherit the throne of Spain, but his father, furious that his son was a Catholic, forbade him the throne and sentenced him to prison. Hermenegild – whom we celebrate on April 13th (a month ago) was in prison for several months as Easter approached. He wanted to receive Communion, Holy Communion for Easter. His father was thinking the same thing and sent him a bishop carrying Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament! What a joy for Hermenegild to be able to make his Easter communion! Except that when the bishop entered the prison cell, he presented himself thus: “I am the Bishop of Huesca, I am an Arian and I bring you Holy Communion!”  “I am Arian,” that is to say “I am a heretic, I'm not Catholic.”

It was a bishop who was not Catholic, dear faithful, who brought Holy Communion to Hermenegild. What did Hermenegild do? What would you have done in his place? Would you still have accepted to receive Holy Communion? In order to receive Jesus in the Eucharist, is it not worth making some compromises, receiving even from unworthy hands the Lord Jesus? This bishop celebrated Mass validly though he did not believe that Jesus is God, because that was the Arian religion. He did not even believe that Jesus was God! But we do think he could validly celebrate Mass and he was bringing Jesus in the Eucharist!
Well, in the twinkling of an eye, inspired by one of the gifts of the Holy Ghost – whom we are celebrating today − the gift of Counsel, he said: “No. I will not receive communion from your sacrilegious hands! As for me, I am in chains but I am free to work my salvation. You, my lord, are free but you are a slave of the devil because you have a false faith, you're not Catholic! And I will not receive Holy Communion from sacrilegious hands!”

What an example for us, my dear faithful! All the beautiful gifts coming from Rome, we are not prepared to accept them without examination, without considering the circumstances in which this gift would be made. We demand to be able to maintain our public and entire profession of the Catholic Faith. We cannot receive poisoned gifts that would condemn us to compromise with Modernism. This is the example of Saint Hermenegild, inspired by the Holy Ghost.

There is also the example of St. Joseph, who remained in that exile in which was found the Church, the whole Church, until it was time to return to the Holy Land. “I called my son out of Egypt.”

In the meantime, dear faithful, let us pray to the Blessed Virgin, the Spouse of the Holy Ghost who was filled with the seven gifts of the Holy Ghost from the very first moment of her conception. She had the gift of Counsel when she received the message from the Archangel Gabriel telling her that she was to become the Mother of God! She said “Yes, fiat!” immediately! The gift of Counsel! And she had the gift of Fortitude at the foot of the Cross when she remained for three hours standing before her Son, God made man, who was agonizing on the Cross, before her eyes! She remained firm as the Mother of the High Priest, the mother of the Victim, the divine victim for our sins. Well, let us ask the Blessed Virgin to fill us with these seven gifts of the Holy Ghost through her intercession, especially the gift of Counsel which will dictate our conduct, and the gift of divine Fortitude, so that we may know when to say “No!” For fortitude consists more in resisting evil than in attacking the enemy. Let us remain very firm, united in the Catholic faith, dear faithful, under the patronage of St. Joseph to whom we shall renew in a moment the consecration of the Society of St. Pius X. Amen!

Thursday, May 23, 2013

!!!!!!!!!! Meet one of the mockers of the true ( before Second Vatican council ) Catholic Church

Believers know that “man does not just live off bread.” They are aware of the fact that they have to make their own personal contribution in their everyday lives and they must do so together, not as competitors but as pilgrims in search of the truth.” The President of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, Cardinal Jean Louis Tauran, said this in a speech he gave in London yesterday evening, at the meeting of bishops and representatives of Europe’s bishops’ conferences for relations with Muslims, organised by the CCEE, due to finish tomorrow.   During the opening session, the cardinal highlighted the importance of Benedict XVI’s visit to Lebanon, where he met with Muslims religious leaders, to foster Christian-Muslim dialogue. 
Loving kindness towards all beings” is the “cornerstone” of Buddhist ethics, Tauran went on to say. Love for God and love for one’s neighbour are “central to the moral teaching of Jesus.” The cardinal then said that in his opinion, “a climate of peace urgently needs to be created, both for Buddhists and Christians, on the basis of the authentic legacy of our religious traditions, in order to love, defend and foster human life.
In the letter addressed to Buddhists, bishops quoted Pope Francis’ words on the “need for dialogue and friendship between the followers of different religious faiths.” It concludes: “let us continue to collaborate in a spirit of renewed compassion and fraternity, to alleviate the suffering of the human family, protecting the sacredness of human life.
Hello Mr.Taurinus , how far will you go in destruction of the values of the true Catholic Church ????
You should remember that No man-made religion is capable of achieving salvation - such religions are, in fact, religions based on lies!
By the way Buddhism is its failure to recognize man's dependence on a supreme God. By ignoring God and by making salvation rest solely on personal effort, Buddha substituted for the Brahmin religion a cold and colourless system of philosophy. Buddhists worship various false gods. Buddhism is an idolatrous and false religion of the evil .

Anathema sit .

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Vatican II: Papal bull omits reference to lay members of Christ’s faithful people - Vatican Insider

Vatican II - Papal bull (Vatican Secret Archive) 
A copy of the Constitution with which John XXIII announced the Second Vatican Council back in December 1961 has been presented in the Vatican
It's probably just an act of carelessness. ( .)

Either way, the fact is that the reference to the “fideles laicos” (the lay members of Christ’s faithful people), in the Latin text of the Apostolic Constitution Humanae Salutis, with which Pope John announced the Second Vatican Council on 25 December 1961, is missing.

This was one of the things that were discussions held today in the Synod Hall, in the Vatican, during the presentation of the fifth volume in the series Humanae Salutis bull Limited edition, put together by Scrinium for the Secret Vatican Archive.

the Humanae Salutis contains an idea of the council that John XXIII expected: “The January 1959 speech in which Papa Roncalli announced his intention to convene a Council to the cardinals gathered in the Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls, the bull and the Gaudet Mater Ecclesia allocution of 11 October 1962, the fist day of the Second Vatican Council, show a consistent development. The bull shows the following: a renewed climate of trust and ecumenical horizon.” Melloni thanked Paul VI for giving scholars access to the Council documents straight away.

When answering a question on the scope of enforcement of the Second Vatican Council and how current it was, Mgr. Pagano mentioned liturgical reform and the “strange and conflicting voices,” saying: “When I see those seven bronze candelabras that hang above the cross at some basilica altars, I think to myself how little was understood of the constitution of the Sacrosanctum Concilium liturgy.

Movie star ... movie star ... you think you are a movie

USA: Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s life coming to cinemas soon | DICI

USA: Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s life coming to cinemas soon


Christian Peschken











Christian Peschken, a producer/director of German origins living in Hollywood, is planning to bring the life of the former archbishop of Buenos Aires to the big screen. According to an article published online April 29, 2013, on the website of the American magazine National Catholic Register, the film will portray Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s life up to the point where he was elected pope.

Christian Peschken has already raised 25 million dollars (19 million euros) from a group of European investors. The movie already has a working title: Friend of the Poor: The Pope Francis Story. Filming could begin in early 2014 and will take place in Rome, mainly, but also in Argentina.

Christian Peschken wants Vatican expert Andrea Tornielli, who recently wrote a biography of the new pope and who has known Jorge Mario Bergoglio personally since 2002, to join the team as a consultant, as well as Argentinean journalist Serge Rubin, co-author of The Jesuit, a book based on two years of conversation with the archbishop of Buenos Aires. The idea of making a movie about Pope Francis came to him when he saw the newly elected pope appear on the balcony of blessings at St. Peter’s. “What a great scene for the end of a movie!” he thought. The name of the lead actor has not yet been made public.

(Sources: – DICI no. 275, 17/05/13)


Vatican Officials Repudiate Misinterpretation of Their Comments on Same-Sex Unions | Daily News |

On April 8, Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, the archbishop of Vienna, reportedly told an audience in London that same-sex relationships should be respected and recognized in law.
“There can be same-sex partnerships, and they need respect and even civil-law protection,” he was reported as saying. But he asked that it be kept “away from the notion of marriage” because the definition of marriage “is the stable union between a man and a woman open to life.”

Think again on same sex civil unions: Cardinal Schoenborn
Published: April 11, 2013

Vienna Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn has said that same-sex relationships should be respected and recognised in law, The Tablet reports.

Cardinal Schönborn made the remarks in a lecture at the National Gallery evening in London titled "Christianity: Alien Presence or Foundation of the West?" on Monday.

"There can be same-sex partnerships and they need respect, and even civil law protection. Yes, but please keep it away from the notion of marriage. Because the definition of marriage is the stable union between a man and a woman open to life," Cardinal Schönborn said.

"We should be clear about terms and respect the needs of people living in a partnership together. They deserve respect," he added.

Anyway ...when he was Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio appeared to favor civil unions as a kind of lesser of two evils. However, a confidant had said he would never have supported civil unions for homosexual couples: “He certainly would have referred to unions of convenience, but not that anything be legalized,” said Miguel Woites, a personal friend of the Pope. He was fiercely opposed to same-sex “marriage” legislation and has not spoken on the issue of civil unions as Pope.
The Vatican declined to comment on the issue when contacted by the Register.

"Misogyny" of the Church ???

Creative Minority Report: Vid: Left Wing Feminist Nun Criticizes Misogyny of the Church

Left Wing Feminist Nun Criticizes Misogyny of the Church
Sister Teresa Forcades is one of Catalonia's foremost political figures, but the nun's ideology is radically feminist and left-wing. In this video, she speaks to the UK Guardian about the need for an alternative to capitalism and criticized the misogyny of the Catholic church.

Just the kind of leadership the Church needs, right?

Meet the Black Pope ... becoming reality ..

Fr. Adolfo Nicolas

The “black pope” has been placed in charge of the International Union of Superiors General for the next three years

Adolfo Nicolas (Superior General of the Society of Jesus since 2008) is the new President of the International Union of Superiors General. The UISG represents the superior generals of more than 200 male religious congregations.
In 2006 and 2009, when the Vatican would not do anything its Salesian Secretary of State, Tarcisio Bertone was not okay with, his fellow Salesian Fr. Pascual Chávez Villanueva, Rector Major of the Society of St. John Bosco, served two mandates as head of the Union. Not long after the first Jesuit in history was elected Pope, the world leader of the Society of Jesus has now been appointed as head of the UISG.
Up until now, Fr. Nicolas was Vice President of the Superiors General and replaces the Franciscan José Rodriguez Carballo (the organisation’s top man for just one year), who was appointed Secretary of the Vatican Congregation for the Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life. The new Vice President will be elected during the General Assembly which has been scheduled for November. The Union of Superiors General is an institution of pontifical right, founded by the Congregation for Religious.

Its purpose is to promote the life and mission of individual institutes that work in service of the Church (!!! ), so as to make their collaboration more efficient and contact with the Holy See and the hierarchy more "fruitful.” (!!!)

In reality : the Jesuit Pontiff is showing his gratitude and obedience to the black/gray Eminence behind the curtain ... the Black Pope .

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Meet Francis the Jesuit and the Logician

Quote :
Heresy is always based on illogic and irrationality, and the mind of "Francis the Logician" is shaped by each of the heresies of Modernism, which he is advancing with great enthusiasm and zeal.
We need to pray for the conversion of the conciliarists as we pray for our own conversion as we seek with  a pure motive to serve God as by surrendering ourselves to Him through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary. That is is all that matters. The Immaculate Heart of Mary will indeed triumph in the end.
Continue to pray as many Rosaries as your state in life permits. Remember that it is a privilege to live in these challenging times as this is the time from all eternity that God has appointed for us to live and thus to know, love and serve Him through His Catholic Church in this time of apostasy and betrayal.
Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.
Saint Antoninus, O.P., pray for us.
Saints Gordian and Epimachus, pray for us. Amen

(courtesy of the high inspired article from Christ or Chaos )

Friday, May 17, 2013

SHOCKING : Pope to "Catholic" Charismatic Renewal: Tell Them I Love Them Very Much | ZENIT - The World Seen From Rome

The whole "New Evangelization" is frightening. It is the One World Church in the works. The Church that Blessed Anna Katherine Emmerick speaks about with the two popes working on it.

Pope to Catholic Charismatic Renewal: Tell Them I Love Them Very Much | ZENIT - The World Seen From Rome

Here is an example of the heresy of "charismatic renewal" , nothing else than music, dance, and... apostasy ! This liturgical abuse has nothing in common with the real and Holy Traditional Latin Mass , the ONLY Catholic Mass

Anathema Sit Jesuit Bergoglio ! Young Catholics, Jews and Muslims will come together at this year’s World Youth Day in Rio de Janeiro (23-28 July).

What are you going to dance Mr.Jesuit Pontiff : samba , tango or both ?

Francis will celebrate a mass in Portuguese during his visit to the Marian shrine of Aparecida, as part of the World Youth Day celebrations that are going to be held in Rio between 22 and 29 July 2013. The news was announced by the Auxiliary Bishop of Aparecida, Darci Nicioli, who explained that the Pope wanted to “get closer” to the Brazilian “faithful”.

The interreligious meeting on July 21st “Even though the Vatican would prefer the mass to be celebrated in the Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida, we are making preparations to allow the Jesuit to bless and address the crowd that will be gathered outside,” Nicioli added.

An Open Letter to Confused Catholics written by His Grace Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre

10. Ecumenism 
 In this confusion of ideas (in which some Catholics now seem to be quite at ease), there is a tendency especially dangerous to the Faith, the more so because it masquerades as charity. The word which appeared in 1927 during a congress held at Lausanne, Switzerland, would have put Catholics on their guard if they had consulted their dictionaries. “Ecumenism: a movement toward reunion of all Christian churches in a single church.” Now it is clear that we cannot combine contradictory principles. We cannot unite truth and error so as to form one thing, except by adopting the error and rejecting all or part of the truth. Ecumenism is self-condemnatory.

The expression has become so fashionable since the last Council that it has slipped into everyday speech. We speak of universal ecumenism, of exploratory ecumenism and whatever else, to express a taste or a preference for diversity and eclecticism. In religious language ecumenism has recently been extended to non-Christian religions and translated straightway into action. A newspaper in western France gives us a perfect example of the way this evolutionary process works. In a small parish near Cherbourg, the Catholic population showed concern for the welfare of the Muslim workers who had arrived to work on a building site. For this charitable action they can only be praised. In the next stage, however, the Muslims asked for a place to celebrate the fast of Ramadan, and the Christians offered them the basement of their church. Then a Koranic school opened. After a couple of years the Christians invited the Muslims to celebrate Christmas with them “around a common prayer made up of extracts from the Koran and verses from the Gospels.” Misplaced charity had led these Christians to come to terms with error.

In Lille the Dominicans have offered the Muslims a chapel to be turned into a mosque. In Versailles collections have been taken up in the churches for the “purchase of a place of worship for the Muslims.” Two other chapels have been handed over at Roubaix and at Marseilles, together with a church at Argenteuil. Catholics have become the apostles of the worst enemy of the Church of Christ--which is what Islam is--and are offering their money to Mohammed. It appears that there are more than four hundred mosques in France, and in many cases Catholics have given the money for their construction.

Nowadays all religions have the Freedom of the City within the Church. A French cardinal celebrated Mass in the presence of some Tibetan monks, dressed in their ceremonial robes and seated in the front row, bowing before them while a commentator announced: “The bonzes share with us in the Eucharistic celebration.” In a church at Rennes, worship of Buddha was celebrated. In Italy, twenty monks were solemnly initiated into Zen by a Buddhist.

I could cite endless examples of such syncretism going on around us. We see associations developing, movements being born which always seem to find an ecclesiastic as leader who wants to join in the quest to “blend all spiritualities in love.” Or astounding projects like the transformation of Notre Dame de la Garde (at Marseilles) into a place of monotheistic worship for Christians, Muslims and Jews, a project which fortunately was stopped by some groups of lay people.

Ecumenism in the strict sense, i.e., as practised among Christians, has motivated joint Eucharistic celebrations with Protestants, such as at Strasbourg. The Anglicans were invited to Chartres Cathedral to celebrate “Eucharistic Communion.” The only celebration which is not allowed, either at Chartres, or at Strasbourg, or at Marseilles, is that of Holy Mass according to the rite codified by Saint Pius V.

What conclusion can be drawn from all this by a Catholic who sees Church authorities condoning such scandalous ceremonies? If all religions are of equal value, he could very well work out his salvation with Buddhists or Protestants. He is running the risk of losing faith in the true Church. This in fact is what is suggested to him. They want to submit the Church to natural law; they want to put it on the same footing with other religions. They refuse to say--even priests, seminarians and seminary professors--that the Catholic Church is the only Church, that she possesses the truth, that she alone is able to lead men to salvation through Jesus Christ. “The Church is only a spiritual leaven within society, but the same as other religions; a bit more than the others, perhaps...” They sometimes grant it a slight superiority, if you press them.

If this is the case, then the Church is merely useful; she is no longer indispensable.

She is only one of the means of salvation. 

 We must say it clearly: such a concept is radically opposed to Catholic dogma. 

The Church is the one ark of salvation, and we must not be afraid to affirm it. You have often heard it said, “Outside the Church there is no salvation”--a dictum which offends contemporary minds. It is easy to believe that this doctrine is no longer in effect, that it has been dropped. It seems excessively severe.

Talking about the heretic Second Vatican Council

In general, the mentality at the Second Vatican Council was little if at all Catholic.
This can be said because of an inexplicable and undeniable man-centeredness and sympathy for the "world" and its deceptive values, all of which ooze from all of the Council's documents. More specifically, Vatican II has been accused of substantive and relevant ambiguities, patent contradictions, significant omissions and, what counts even more, of grave errors in doctrine and pastorality.

First of all, ambiguity pervades the Second Vatican Council's nature as to law (i.e., "juridical nature"). This remains unclear and appears indeterminate because Vatican II termed itself simply a "pastoral Council" which, therefore, did not intend to define dogmas or condemn errors. This can be seen from the address delivered at the Council's opening by Pope John XXIII on October 11, 1962, and in the Notificatio, publicly read on November 5, 1965. Therefore, the Council's two Constitutions, Dei Verbum (on Divine Revelation) and Lumen Gentium (on the Church), which, in fact, do concern matters of dogmas of the Faith, are dogmatic only in name and in a solely descriptive sense.

The Council wanted to disqualify the "authentically manifest and supreme ordinary Magisterium" (Pope Paul VI). This is an insufficient figure of speech for an ecumenical council since such councils always embody an extraordinary exercise of the Magisterium, with the Pope deciding to exercise its exceptional nature together with all of the bishops assembled by him in council. He acts therein as the suprema potestas of the entire Church, which he possesses by Divine right. Neither does reference to the "authentic character" of Vatican II explain things, because such a term generally means "authoritative" relative to the Holy Father's sole authority, not to his infallibility.

The "mere authenticum"ordinary Magisterium is not infallible, while the ordinary Magisterium is infallible. 

In any case, the ordinary Magisterium's infallibility does not have the same characteristics as the extraordinary Magisterium.

Thus, it cannot be applied to the Second Vatican Council. It is necessary to realize that the point in question is how many bishops throughout the Catholic world are teaching the same doctrine, and not how many are present at a Council. Such being Vatican II's actual juridical nature, it is certain that it did not wish to impart a teaching invested with infallibility.

It is true that Pope Paul VI himself said that the Council's teaching ought to be "docilely and sincerely" accepted by the faithful, that is, with (we specifically note) what is always called "internal religious assent," something required of any pastoral document, for instance. This assent is obligatory, but only on the condition that sufficient and grave reasons do not exist for not granting such assent.

Might a question of "grave reason" be concerned when alterations in the deposit of Faith are evident? Already during Vatican II's tormented discussions, cardinals, bishops, and theologians, faithful to dogma, repeatedly noted the ambiguities and errors which were infiltrating Council texts, errors that today, after 40 years of definitive reflection and study, we are grasping ever more precisely. We do not pretend completeness for our synopsis of the errors ascribed to Vatican II. Yet it seems to us that we have specified in what follows a sufficient number of important ones, beginning with the first utterances such as those contained in the Council's October 20, 1962 "Address on Openness" by His Holiness John XXIII and the Council Fathers' "Message to the World." Though not one of the official, formal Council texts, nevertheless, these texts expressed the thinking wanted by the "progressive wing," that is, the neo-modernist innovators' line of thinking.

Being Traditional Catholic

As is the case in the political field, there have always been differing views on appropriate Church discipline and governance. These views range from the extremely liberal to very traditional. Most of the opinions which today fall under the category of "liberalism" are actually heterodox or heretical and of little value in most Catholic discussions. Because of this element "within" the Church and the overall shift that occurred around the time of the Second Vatican Council, the classic battle between liberals and conservatives has undergone a deceptive change in terminology. As the heretics of yesterday have become the liberals of today, the liberals of yesterday now lay claim to the title "conservative". Consequently the conservatives came to be known as "traditionalists". Unfortunately, these terms are no longer completely accurate descriptions. So for the purposes of this essay, I will use the following general definitions to delineate the differences between traditionalists and "conservatives": Traditional( or Traditionalist ): One who challenges the novel practices and teachings of Catholics (including bishops and priests) which appear to contradict the prior teaching of the Church. A traditionalist questions the prudence of new pastoral approaches and holds the belief that those things generally deemed objectively good or evil several decades ago remain so today.

Traditional Catholic forever

The Truth About Holy Pope Pius XII's Wartime Record

The voice of Pius XII is a lonely voice in the silence and darkness enveloping Europe this Christmas. The Pope reiterates what he has said before. In general, he repeats, although with greater definiteness, the five-point plan for peace which he first enunciated in his Christmas message after the war broke out in 1939. His program agrees in fundamentals with the Roosevelt-Churchill eight-point declaration. It calls for respect for treaties and the end of the possibility of aggression, equal treatment for minorities, freedom from religious persecution. It goes farther than the Atlantic Charter in advocating an end of all national monopolies of economic wealth, and so far as the eight points, which demands complete disarmament for Germany pending some future limitation of arms for all nations.

The Pontiff emphasized principles of international morality with which most men of good-will agree. He uttered the ideas a spiritual leader would be expected to express in time of war. Yet his words sound strange and bold in the Europe of today, and we comprehend the complete submergence and enslavement of great nations, the very sources of our civilization, as we realize that he is about the only ruler left o the Continent of Europe who dares to raise his voice at all. The last tiny islands of neutrality are so hemmed in and overshadowed by war and fear that no one but the Pope is still able to speak aloud in the name of the Prince of Peace. This is indeed a measure of the "moral devastation" he describes as the accompaniment of physical ruin and inconceivable human suffering.

In calling for a "real new order" based on "liberty, justice and love," to be attained only by a "return to social and international principles capable of creating a barrier against the abuse of liberty and the abuse of power," the Pope put himself squarely against Hitlerism. Recognizing that there is no road open to agreement between belligerents "whose reciprocal war aims and programs seem to be irreconcilable," he left no doubt that the Nazi aims are also irreconcilable with his own conception of a Christian peace. "The new order which must arise out of this war," he asserted, "must be based on principles." And that implies only one end to the war. (The New York Times, December 25, 1941.)

No Christmas sermon reaches a larger congregation than the message Pope Pius XII addresses to a war-torn world at this season. This Christmas more than ever he is a lonely voice crying out of the silence of a continent. The Pulpit whence he speaks is more than ever like the Rock on which the Church was founded, a tiny island lashed and surrounded by a sea of war. In these circumstances, in any circumstances, indeed, no one would expect the Pope to speak as a political leader, or a war leader, or in any other role than that of a preacher ordained to stand above the battle, tied impartially, as he says, to all people and willing to collaborate in any new order which will bring a just peace.

But just because the Pope speaks to and in some sense for all the peoples at war, the clear stand he takes on the fundamental issues of the conflict has greater weight and authority. When a leader bound impartially to nations on both sides condemns as heresy the new form of national state which subordinates everything to itself: when he declares that whoever wants peace must protect against "arbitrary attacks" the "juridical safety of individuals:" when he assails violent occupation of territory, the exile and persecution of human beings for no reason other than race or political opinion: when he says that people must fight for a just and decent peace, a "total peace" — the "impartial judgment" is like a verdict in a high court of justice.

Pope Pius expresses as passionately as any leader on our side the war aims of the struggle for freedom when he says that those who aim at building a new world must fight for free choice of government and religious order. They must refuse that the state should make of individuals a herd of whom the state disposes as if they were a lifeless thing. (The New York Times, December 25, 1942.) (The Christmas Editorials on Pope Pius XII.)

Certainly not Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who seems to be "uncertain" about the existence of the weight of testimony that indicates the historical record is clear and unequivocal in support of Pope Pius XII's work during World War II.

There is no "open" question to be discussed, certainly nothing to be justified to those who hate the Faith and who only support "popes" who have by their words and actions made it appear as though Talmudic Judaism is a perfectly valid religion in which its adherents are assured of their eternal salvation.

* Article taken from the awesome inspired Christ or Chaos site :

Showing Us The Value Of A Conciliar Consecration

One of the many heresies